the sofiet..
that D. Schultz had mind tnegotiation
#5 Schretty men hoved that
X
"The contract of the cookies now in
were about to exprice"
the Island
Jma3. 48323
For Thryard asked & I "under what conditions
the made, a since
-
the shipment was I have no power to authonge the dep t
Cooke's under indentie
"This is not matt
In any case by it the island whe
how be signed afte
28873
A. Schults
" said that although the coolics were indented"
I quote these extracts to show that when
14taly
writing his dup of (0373) Su 3 Luger
was aware that the cookies ugmind
4th Schults were
indenbered arles
But the present deep seems quite inconsistent.
the says (pace 2) that Menschendt's application
was not for indentured cookies het her.
"assisted emigrants": the me
Land some
doubt as tahether heart's corher wer
ms
Ar
inden hired or not). But so
10 far. understand the resty pars & of thirds. the cookies applied to by rents wenst
Dr Schults were, soth speake, identical
(400,
349
what becomes of
& I's admission's
(m-28373) that the cooke's were to be inden hi
Imag and that to
in 28873
my
mind there is nothing
to indicate that the applications
& Rewendt & & Schultz
Artw
connected. I gathered that wendt's had afphed,
Lasten prin permission, but for some reason nother not caplaried, had decided not to avail them selves & the premiersion; that afterwards & Stellin
Cate
along with his
application. But it scenes that benols,
wene faially not aboved to send the cookies
that at Schully what.
KRA
interming on thin
I submit that whateres magh the far to othe
Case
in news (there drept
I hesitate to only
express an opinion) the interpretation to be Sird hugands' dup of 14 July
plaus
is that B Schulty mather permession
to get indentured cookies from thong to Samo a
this interpretation
: and it was on
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.